<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Professional vs User-Generated Content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hourglass8.com/professional-usergenerated-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hourglass8.com/professional-usergenerated-content/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 23:41:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BrnzeTyger</title>
		<link>http://hourglass8.com/professional-usergenerated-content/comment-page-1/#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>BrnzeTyger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hourglass8.com/?p=1256#comment-503</guid>
		<description>These days User-generated content isn&#039;t truly low-quality as most people would assume.  With film making for example, one doesn&#039;t necessarily need to have costly equipment to create a decent short or feature-length film that will appeal to a small niche or wide audience.  These days there are a lot of the independent projects that are created which were made on a shoe string budget.

I can see why some would feel that having a &quot;professionally&quot; made video mitigates the risk of having a poorly made product.  That assumes that the production company has maintained its reputation for making content within budget and in a timely fashion.  

Solid research should be done beforehand to avoid just going to the first production company that has the appearance of being &quot;big&quot;.  Word of mouth is huge in this regard since its very possible for a  well-known company that built its brand on creating good content can slack off in its later years.  There are a lot of companies that were once huge that are no longer around because of poor quality of work or service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These days User-generated content isn&#8217;t truly low-quality as most people would assume.  With film making for example, one doesn&#8217;t necessarily need to have costly equipment to create a decent short or feature-length film that will appeal to a small niche or wide audience.  These days there are a lot of the independent projects that are created which were made on a shoe string budget.</p>
<p>I can see why some would feel that having a &#8220;professionally&#8221; made video mitigates the risk of having a poorly made product.  That assumes that the production company has maintained its reputation for making content within budget and in a timely fashion.  </p>
<p>Solid research should be done beforehand to avoid just going to the first production company that has the appearance of being &#8220;big&#8221;.  Word of mouth is huge in this regard since its very possible for a  well-known company that built its brand on creating good content can slack off in its later years.  There are a lot of companies that were once huge that are no longer around because of poor quality of work or service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
